kvmshutter.blogg.se

Stephen king dreamcatcher review
Stephen king dreamcatcher review




stephen king dreamcatcher review

I can understand it, since some of the most important stuff is just referenced in passing (such as most things relating to Mr. I think the reason most people didn't like Dreamcatcher is that they didn't know what the hell was going on. For those who thought Jack Nicholson's transformation in The Shining happened too quickly, they obviously haven't seen Dreamcatcher.

stephen king dreamcatcher review

Abraham Curtis (Morgan Freeman, with the named changed from the original Kurtz, a reference to Apocalypse Now, because I guess hearing a name will automatically trigger the "plagiarism" sensor in viewer's minds more than reading it) is in charge of the governmental side of the aliens, while he supposedly goes crazy. During their twentieth year of going out there, aliens land nearby and alter the course of their lives forever. In their childhood, they had been united by a mentally retarded friend, Duddits (Donnie Wahlberg), which linked all of them with some sort of telepathy that they usually don't talk about. Four childhood friends, Beaver (Jason Lee), Henry (Thomas Jane), Jonesy (Damian Lewis) and Pete (Timothy Olyphant), go to some woods in Maine for their annual hunting trip. He knows how to work with the material that he and Goldman wrote, and it turns out to be something much better than the source material. Filmmakers need to be able to have creative licenses, and that's what Kasdan does. That's how the aforementioned remakes failed. Trouble is, eventually, it gets boring and too true to the book. That's why the miniseries are always hot to trot, because they can stretch things out to the length of the book. The hardest part of having the arduous task of adapting a King book is taking 1000+ pages and putting it into a reasonable amount of time for the viewer. Having doubted William Goldman's ability since Marathon Man and the partial butchering of Misery, but since he's writing here with director Lawrence Kasdan, he can't foul up that badly. The book was 1000 pages of hit-or-miss horror, and the movie condenses it into two and a quarter hours that takes most of the best parts from the book.

stephen king dreamcatcher review

Of course, there's exceptions (such as The Shining and Carrie-both of which were poorly remade), but one that makes the book look like string cheese is Dreamcatcher. When John Grisham or Stephen King writes a book, everyone can expect it to be turned into some sort of movie that's not as good (the only one that hasn't had that happen to it is the latter's Insomnia-and it really deserves to be made into something great) as the book was.






Stephen king dreamcatcher review